One person finds themselves on a podium with a gold medal draped around their neck; another lies broken beneath the weight of an addiction, or giving in to mediocrity. The difference, we are told, is not IQ, not talent, not even luck. It is attitude.
This might sound like the kind of thing you’d find on a motivational poster in a dentist’s office, until you realize it is exactly what Viktor Frankl argued after surviving Auschwitz.
“Everything can be taken from a man but one thing," he wrote, "the last of the human freedoms—to choose one’s attitude in any given set of circumstances, to choose one’s own way.”
In his book The Difference Maker, John Maxwell echoes Frankl’s conviction, albeit in more digestible prose. “Attitude is the criterion for success,” he declares. Not genius. Not breeding. Not even circumstance. Attitude.
But what is attitude, really? Is it a mood? A disposition? Science suggests it is something far more fundamental: an operational system rooted in our biology and cognitive habits. At its core is our locus of control, the degree to which we believe we are the architects of our own lives. This cognitive framework is then shaped by what Stanford psychologist Carol Dweck calls our “mindset,” a distinction grounded in the hard science of neuroplasticity. This is not a metaphor; when we consistently choose effort over despair, we are physically remodeling the brain, forging new neural pathways. It is a physiological act wherein the brain's prefrontal cortex, our center for reasoning, learns to modulate the fear signals of the amygdala. Attitude, then, is the disciplined act of consciously directing the wiring of your own mind, a triumph of executive function over emotional reflex.
Persistence
Denis Waitley states:
“The winner’s edge is not in a gifted birth, a high IQ, or in talent. The winner’s edge is all in the attitude, not aptitude.”
This flips a long-standing cultural myth on its head. We’ve built monuments to prodigies. We lionize the naturally gifted. But the science suggests it is not the precocious child but the persistent one who most reliably succeeds. An unglamorous truth, but a liberating one.
Still, the seduction of a good attitude is not just its utility. There’s an existential defiance buried in it. Frankl’s insight, honed not in the halls of academia but in a concentration camp, a death camp, was that homo sapiens inner world remains inviolable even in the face of the most obscene external cruelties. A modern maxim puts it plainly:
“I cannot always choose what happens to me, but I can always choose what happens in me.”
This reads like a secular cousin to Frankl’s sacred assertion.
Reframing
Psychologically, this idea forms the backbone of one of the most effective therapeutic approaches in the modern world: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. At its core is the practice of cognitive reappraisal, the act of systematically reframing a situation in order to alter its emotional effect. CBT teaches patients to become aware of their thought patterns, question their validity, and replace them with more constructive alternatives. What Frankl did under unimaginable duress is now a validated clinical practice, taught in therapy rooms around the globe.
History lends credence to this. James Stockdale, a U.S. Navy pilot shot down in Vietnam and held prisoner for seven years, credited his survival not to optimism but to what he called stoic realism: confronting the brutal facts while maintaining the belief that he would prevail.
“You must never confuse faith that you will prevail in the end...with the discipline to confront the most brutal facts of your current reality,” he said.
Attitude, in this frame, is neither cheeriness nor denial. It is moral posture.
Of course, we must be careful not to weaponize attitude against those already burdened. The neoliberal obsession with personal responsibility can easily slide into cruelty: if attitude is everything, then poverty is a mindset and trauma a failure of grit.
Stressors
That is not what Frankl meant, and it is not what the better angels of psychology suggest. Attitude matters, but so do systems, histories, and luck. Furthermore, the biology of stress, as documented by the brilliant neuroendocrinologist Robert Sapolsky, shows that chronic adversity and a lack of control unleash a toxic cascade of cortisol and other stress hormones that impair memory, weaken immunity, and damage the brain. To demand resilience from someone drowning in stress hormones is not just unjust, it is biologically illiterate.
What makes the idea powerful is not that it absolves us from fate, but that it reminds us of where our agency begins. A paraplegic who becomes a poet. A refugee who becomes a doctor. A prisoner who becomes a philosopher. These are not miracles; they are what happens when a human being refuses to outsource their interior world to circumstance. Attitude is not a slogan. It is a decision, renewed daily.
Make your attitude your greatest asset. But do it with eyes and heart open, aware that you are not choosing your burdens, only how to carry them.
That is not cheap optimism. That is sovereignty.
Stay curious
Colin
Image from Unsplash
Thanks, as always, Colin! Do you think there is, or could become, a way of testing every individual for cortisol and other hormone levels, to determine whether their problem is with attitude or rather crippling stress? It seems like every conversation must start here, right?
We should probably refocus our education systems to teach fewer subjects, but teach them better. Off the cuff, three subjects would seem important:
Numeracy
Literacy
Being Human
That last one would include learning about human cognitive fallacies alongside concepts like those presented here about the locus of control.
Everywhere I look, I see defeated people who have resigned themselves to failure.
You can do something. You can control many things in your life if you have the right attitude.