Thank you. Now what a thought provoking idea you have, very intriguing - so from what I understand, you’re describing a framework where double-scope blending isn’t bound by conventional spatial or temporal logic? Instead, the brain processes concepts in a distributed, a-temporal, a-spatial way, where pattern matching and predictions aren’t confined to linear cause-effect logic but rather emerge from cross-scale decryption across the cortex - which makes sense. And if I understand correctly this resonates with the idea of ‘conceptual determinism,’ where even seemingly unrelated ideas converge to influence future states. Now that is deep and meaningful.. and clearly a path to develop further, not annoying at all
Thank you. Now what a thought provoking idea you have, very intriguing - so from what I understand, you’re describing a framework where double-scope blending isn’t bound by conventional spatial or temporal logic? Instead, the brain processes concepts in a distributed, a-temporal, a-spatial way, where pattern matching and predictions aren’t confined to linear cause-effect logic but rather emerge from cross-scale decryption across the cortex - which makes sense. And if I understand correctly this resonates with the idea of ‘conceptual determinism,’ where even seemingly unrelated ideas converge to influence future states. Now that is deep and meaningful.. and clearly a path to develop further, not annoying at all